Improved high-frequency equivalent circuit model based on distributed effects for SiGe HBTs with CBE layout
Sun Ya-Bin, Li Xiao-Jin, Zhang Jin-Zhong, Shi Yan-Ling
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, Department of Electrical Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: xjli@ee.ecnu.edu.cn jzzhang@ee.ecnu.edu.cn

Abstract

In this paper, we present an improved high-frequency equivalent circuit for SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) with a CBE layout, where we consider the distributed effects along the base region. The actual device structure is divided into three parts: a link base region under a spacer oxide, an intrinsic transistor region under the emitter window, and an extrinsic base region. Each region is considered as a two-port network, and is composed of a distributed resistance and capacitance. We solve the admittance parameters by solving the transmission-line equation. Then, we obtain the small-signal equivalent circuit depending on the reasonable approximations. Unlike previous compact models, in our proposed model, we introduce an additional internal base node, and the intrinsic base resistance is shifted into this internal base node, which can theoretically explain the anomalous change in the intrinsic bias-dependent collector resistance in the conventional compact model.

1. Introduction

In recent years, SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) have undergone rapid growth because of their high speed, high driving power, and low noise, and they have been applied to fields such as wireless communication, analog circuit, fast data acquisition, and conversion.[13] Small-signal equivalent circuit models, such as the lumped SGP, VBIC, HICUM, and Mextram, are often used to characterize transistor performance, optimize the device structure, and guide circuit design.[46] However, bipolar transistors are actually large distributed networks that are composed of a basic resistance and capacitance, and their design is not always as easy as described in the above lumped models. Although most transistor electrical performances can be effectively characterized by lumped models, there remain fundamental limitations with respect to actual device structures.[7] When extracting the small-signal model parameters in conventional Mextram, we find that the bias-dependent collector epilayer resistance RC1C2 monotonously decreases as the base voltage VBC increases, which clearly deviates from basic device physics theory, and the underlying physical mechanism should therefore be investigated.

Owing to its special base structure, SiGe HBTs show a built-in multi-Mrad total dose hardness with no intentional hardening.[810] However, single-event effects (SEE) remain a serious problem, with recent results demonstrating a low linear energy-transfer threshold and high saturated cross-sections.[1114] A reduction in the sensitive area enclosed by deep trench isolation is considered an effective method of improving the net upset cross section. Therefore, a transistor with minimum feature size, i.e., using only a single collector, base, and emitter (CBE) contacts, possesses a high SEE immunity, compared with standard devices with double collector and base contacts (CBEBC).[11,12] Furthermore, when the transistors are exposed to the space-energetic particle environment, the distributed effect is more significant because the irradiation damages are generally not uniformly distributed throughout the whole transistor structure.[8] Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the small-signal equivalent circuit based on the distributed effects for SiGe HBTs with a CBE layout.

In the present work, in order to determine the physical mechanisms by which the extracted RCC decreases as VBC increases, we propose an improved small-signal equivalent circuit that is based on the distributed effects for SiGe HBTs with a CBE layout. The whole transistor is divided into three parts along the base region. Then, we obtain the high-frequency equivalent circuit under the cut-off mode by solving transmission line equations, and taking into account the distributed effects. The intrinsic base resistance RBI is pushed into the internal base node, and the added component of RBI(CTE+CTC)/3CTC is found to contribute to the declined RCC as VBC increases. Finally, we obtain the equivalent circuit in the forward-active mode by adding four additional modules into the equivalent circuit in the cut-off states.

2. Background

The conventional hybrid-.π small-signal equivalent circuit for SiGe HBTs under forward- active mode is depicted in Fig. 1, as adopted in HICUM or Mextram. The collector series resistance and base series resistance are separately divided into two parts: a constant external part RCX and intrinsic bias-dependent epilayer resistance RC1C2, a constant external resistance RBX, and a variable intrinsic resistance RBI.

Fig. 1. Conventional small-signal equivalent circuit for SiGe HBTs.

As demonstrated in our previous study, the small-signal model parameters can be precisely extracted based on the non-linear rational function fitting.[15] However, we observed an abnormal variation of the collector epilayer resistance RC1C2, and it decreases as the base voltage VBC increases, as shown in Fig. 2. It appears that this variation deviates from basic device physics theory, and RC1C2 is actually expected to increase as VBC decreases. According to the cross-sectional view of the intrinsic transistor under the emitter window, as shown in Fig. 3, the depletion width WBC narrows as VBC increases, and this is because of the decreased reverse bias voltage. Consequently, the width of the neutral collector region WCK increases, causing an increase in RC1C2.

Fig. 2. Extracted collector epitaxy layer resistance RC1C2 as a function of VBC.
Fig. 3. (color online) A simplified cross-sectional view of the intrinsic transistor.

Therefore, in the conventional compact model, the obtained RC1C2 contradicts basic device physics theory. In order to find the underlying physical mechanism, starting with the actual device structure, we propose an improved high-frequency small-signal equivalent circuit for SiGe HBTs based on the distribution effects. The intrinsic base resistance RBI is pushed into the introduced internal base node, and contributes to the collector resistance with certain proportion, and this can fundamentally explain the above abnormal variation of RC1C2 versus the base voltage VBC.

3. Device-under-test and method for the proposed model

The device evaluated in this work features a single-stripe CBE configuration, i.e., with only one CBE, as opposed to the larger CBEBC stripe configuration. The typical cross-section is shown in Fig. 4. The key process includes an n collector epitaxy, a graded SiGe base epitaxy, an in-situ doped polysilicon emitter, LOCOS isolation, an n+ collector sinker, and an ion-implanted extrinsic base. Along the base region, the whole transistor structure is divided into three parts: I) a link base region including the spacer oxide, II) an intrinsic transistor region, and III) an extrinsic BC junction containing metal silicide.

Fig. 4. (color online) Schematic cross-section for SiGe HBT with a single-stripe CBE structure.

In the present work, we separately determine the small-signal equivalent circuit under the cut-off and forward-active mode. Each region is considered as a two-port network composed of several basic resistors and capacitors. We obtained the admittance parameters by solving the transmission-line equation, and we then determine the small-signal equivalent circuit in the cut-off mode depending on some reasonable approximations, using the well-known π network characteristics,[16] as shown in Fig. 5. Finally, we directly obtained the equivalent circuit in forward-active mode by adding four additional modules.

Fig. 5. The well-known characteristics of the π network.
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Equivalent circuit under cut-off mode
4.1.1. Link-base region

As depicted in Fig. 4, the link-base region contains only the BC junction, and the distributed network is shown in Fig. 6, where rbl is the series-base resistance and cbl is the shunt BC junction capacitance per unit length. We assume that all of the electrical elements along the link-base region are distributed uniformly. The total length of this region is assumed to be d.

Fig. 6. Distributed network for the link-base region in the cut-off mode.

To determine the current i(z) and voltage v(z) at any position z, we have the following equation:

i.e.,
Combined with the boundary conditions v(0) = V1 and v(d) = V2, the general solution of Eq. (2) along the transmission line is given as
where is the complex propagation coefficient. As a result, the two driving-point admittances for the link-base region of the SiGe HBT with the CBE layout are given as
and the two transfer admittances are:
Then we can obtain the following equations:
With respect to Fig. 5, it is difficult to directly determine the equivalent circuit according to Eqs. (8) and (9). It is necessary to approximate the exponential term e±γd using the Taylor series. Obviously, the more items taken in the Taylor series expansion, the more accurate will be the obtained equivalent circuit; however, the obtained equivalent circuit may be more complicated. Considering the trade-off between the accuracy and complexity, here, we approximated e±γd as a third-order Taylor expanded formula
Then, substituting Eq. (10) into Eqs. (8) and (9), we obtain
where RBL = drbl and CBL = dcbl separately represent the total series resistance and shunt capacitance for the link-base region. Then, the equivalent circuit for the link-base region of the SiGe HBT with the CBE layout can be simplified in the following form in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. Simplified equivalent circuit for the link-base region of the SiGe HBT with the CBE layout.
4.1.2. Intrinsic transistor region

The distributed network for the intrinsic transistor region is shown in Fig. 8. Similar to the link-base region, we assume that the electrical parameters along the length direction are distributed uniformly. The series-intrinsic base resistance, BE junction, and BC junction shut capacitance per unit length are set as rbi, cte and ctc, respectively. The total length of the intrinsic transistor is set as l.

Fig. 8. Distributed network for the intrinsic transistor region under cut-off mode.

First, we determine Y11 and Y21 for the two-port network in Fig. 8. The base terminal B2 and emitter terminal E1 are separately applied to voltage V1 and ground (here V2 = 0). Then, we reduce the distributed network to the form in Fig. 9. With boundary conditions v(0) = V1, i(l) = 0 and the similar approaches to the solution, Y11 and Y21 are written as

where is the complex propagation constant for this two-port network.

Fig. 9. Equivalent distributed network of intrinsic transistor for solving Y11 and Y12, where the emitter terminal is connected to ground and the base terminal B1 is the applied voltage V1.

Next, we obtain the admittance parameter Y22. Now, we apply emitter terminal E1 to V2, and base terminal B2 is grounded. The current i(z) and voltage v(z) at arbitrary position z satisfies the following equation:

Considering the boundary conditions v(0) = 0 and i(l) = 0, the voltage v(z) and current i(z) along the intrinsic base region are determined by
We assume that iB2 and iE1 represent the current flowing into terminals B2 and E1, and itc is the total current flowing into ground through ctc. According to Kirchhoff’s law, there exists iB2+iE1 = itc, where
Then, we can obtain
Considering the third-order Taylor expanded formula, we can obtain
where CTC = ctcl, CTE = ctel, and RBI = rbil are the total intrinsic BC junction capacitance, intrinsic BE junction capacitance, and intrinsic base resistance, respectively. Then, the distributed network of the intrinsic transistor is equivalent to that in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10. Simplified equivalent circuit for the distributed network of the intrinsic transistor region.
4.1.3. Extrinsic base region

A heavily doped poly-silicon and metal silicide with a low sheet resistance are generally employed in modern advanced SiGe HBT technology.[2] Consequently, the extrinsic base resistance RBX is significantly reduced, and is much smaller than RBL and RBI. Therefore, the distributed effect in the extrinsic base region is not obvious. For simplicity, the extrinsic base region is represented by a lumped parallel RC network, as shown in Fig. 11, where CBCX is the extrinsic BC junction capacitance.

Fig. 11. Simplified equivalent circuit for the extrinsic base region.
4.1.4. Equivalent circuit model for the whole transistor in cutoff mode

Once the equivalent-circuit of the link-base region, intrinsic transistor region, and extrinsic base region are determined by solving the transmission-line equation, we obtain the following hybrid-.π small-signal equivalent circuit for SiGe HBTs with a CBE layout under cut-off mode, as shown in Fig. 12. The parasitic emitter resistances and collector resistances are treated as lumped elements that depend on the device geometry. The series-collector resistance contains two parts: a constant external part RCX and an intrinsic bias-dependent part RC1C2. In addition to a simple substrate network, we adopted a parasitic substrate resistance RSU in series with the substrate-collector junction capacitance CSU and CTS to model the substrate characteristics.[16]

Fig. 12. Improved small-signal equivalent circuit for SiGe HBT with CBE layout in cutoff mode.

Compared to the conventional MEXTRAM and HICUM, the high-frequency small-signal equivalent circuit presented in this work introduces an additional circuit node B2, which separates the intrinsic base resistance RBI and the link-base resistance, RBL. Furthermore, the intrinsic base resistance RBI is shifted into the internal node B2 and separately contributes to the emitter resistance and collector resistance with various proportions. As marked within the dashed-line box, the admittance Y1 can be approximately rewritten as

which means that the marked network can be considered open and removed from the small-signal equivalent-circuit at low frequency. Hence the component of RBI(CTE + CTC)/3CTC is directly added to the intrinsic bias-dependent collector resistance RC1C2, and it is regarded as a total equivalent resistance . It is the added component of RBI(CTE + CTC)/3CTC that can fundamentally explain why the collector epitaxial collector resistance decreases as VBC increases. As VBC increases, the BC junction depletion width decreases, and then the width of the neutral base region increases owing to a decreased reverse bias voltage. The base current flows parallel with the BC junction and is perpendicular to the direction of the base width. Therefore, the increased neutral base width leads to a reduction of the intrinsic base resistance RBI. Considering the large ratio of (CTE+CTC)/CTC, the decreased RBI causes the collector resistance RC1C2 to decrease as VBC increases.

4.2. Equivalent circuit in forward-active mode

Generally, in order to achieve the current amplification, SiGe HBTs are usually biased in the forward-active mode with a common-emitter configuration. As shown in Fig. 13, the corresponding small-signal equivalent circuit can be easily obtained based on the result of the cut-off mode. Because the BE junction is forward-biased, for simplicity, two elements, the junction diffusion capacitance Cπ and the junction diffusion resistance Rπ, are added in parallel with the BE junction depletion capacitance CTE. We used Cπ and Rπ to characterize the response of the BE junction to an applied low-frequency small-signal sinusoidal voltage, and their values are functions of the BE junction current. Cπ reflects the ability of charge storage in the base region as a function of vbe, and Rπ reflects the modulation effect of the emitter voltage on the base current. The voltage-dependent current GmVbe is the collector current in the transistor, and it is controlled by the internal voltage Vbe. Gm models the modulation effect of the base voltage on the collector current. The output resistance ro is primarily due to the Early effect.[7] In the future, we will focus on the model parameter extraction for our proposed model.

Fig. 13. Improved small-signal equivalent-circuit model for SiGe HBT in the forward-active mode.

Theoretically, the proposed small-signal model is still applicable when the SiGe HBT operates under very high frequency because the proposed model is based on the high-frequency distributed effects. The whole transistor is considered as a large distributed network consisting of basic elements, such as a resistance, a capacitance and a diode. In fact, the proposed model should also be verified by performing simulations or experiments. The verification process generally includes two parts: parameter extraction from the measured results, and a comparison between the measured and simulated (in ADS) results. However, the parameter extraction process is relatively complicated and we are in the process of achieving this task. Details about the parameter extraction and the verification process will be included in our following work

5. Conclusion

This paper presents a novel high-frequency small-signal equivalent-circuit for SiGe HBTs with a CBE layout, and is based on the distributed effects in an actual device structure. According to the base region position, the whole transistor is divided into three parts: a link-base region, an intrinsic transistor region, and an extrinsic base region. We obtained the Y parameters for each region by solving the transmission-line equation. We obtained the small-signal equivalent circuit in the cut-off and forward-active mode using the well-known π network characteristics under reasonable approximations. The proposed equivalent circuit model can fundamentally explain the anomalous variations that exist between the bias-dependent collector resistance and the base voltage in conventional compact models. In the future, we aim to focus on the parameter extraction for our proposed model.

Reference
[1] Schmid R L Song P Coen C T Ulusoy A C Cressler J D 2014 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 62 2755
[2] Avenier G Ribes G Montagne A Canderle E Celi D Derrier N 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 3.9.1
[3] Pekarik J J Adkisson J Gray P Liu Q Camillo-Castillo R Khater M 2014 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM) 92
[4] McAndrew C Seitchik J Bowers D 1995 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM) 170
[5] Schröter M Chakravorty A 2010 Compact Hierarchical Modeling of Bipolar Transistors with HICUM Singapore World Scientific
[6] Van D T R Paasschens J C J Kloosterman W J 2012 The Mextram Bipolar Transistor Model level 504.11.0 Delft University of Technolog
[7] Cressler J D 2008 Measurement and Modeling of Silicon Heterostructure Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
[8] Sun Y B Fu J Xu J Wang Y D Zhou W Zhang W 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 0116104
[9] Li P Guo H X Guo Q Zhang J X Xiao Y Wei Y Cui J W 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 088502
[10] Sun Y B Fu J Xu J Wang Y D Zhou W Zhang W 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 048501
[11] Sutton A K Bellini M Cressler J D Pellish J A Reed R A Marshall P W 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 6 2044
[12] Krithivasan R Marshall P W Nayeem M Sutton A K Kuo W Haugerud B M 2006 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 3400
[13] Reed R A Marshall P W Pickel J C Carts M A Fodness B Niu G F 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 2184
[14] Marshall P W Carts M A Campbell A McMorrow D Buchner S Stewart R 2000 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 47 2669
[15] Sun Y B Fu J Xu J Wang Y Zhou W Zhang W 2015 Superlattices and Microstructures 80 11
[16] Chen H Chen K Huang G Chang C 2006 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 9 2287